<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.2" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: DoFollow Spammer Scum</title>
	<link>http://facibus.com/onblogging/2007/06/06/dofollow-spammer-scum/</link>
	<description>Andrew looks at Blogging and Blog Life</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 08:34:20 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Boyd</title>
		<link>http://facibus.com/onblogging/2007/06/06/dofollow-spammer-scum/#comment-175</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Boyd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jun 2007 00:30:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://facibus.com/onblogging/2007/06/06/dofollow-spammer-scum/#comment-175</guid>
		<description>Hi Wendy,

good point. I guess that I don't have to worry about these human spammers so much because (a) I'm not that popular yet and (b) I'm not looking at it as a business so much as a hobby. Like I said, I feel for you - because you have a great blog and deserve to make a living from it.

Best regards, Andrew</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Wendy,</p>
<p>good point. I guess that I don&#8217;t have to worry about these human spammers so much because (a) I&#8217;m not that popular yet and (b) I&#8217;m not looking at it as a business so much as a hobby. Like I said, I feel for you - because you have a great blog and deserve to make a living from it.</p>
<p>Best regards, Andrew</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wendy Piersall</title>
		<link>http://facibus.com/onblogging/2007/06/06/dofollow-spammer-scum/#comment-173</link>
		<dc:creator>Wendy Piersall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jun 2007 21:04:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://facibus.com/onblogging/2007/06/06/dofollow-spammer-scum/#comment-173</guid>
		<description>Thanks for continuing the conversation Andrew - the "nice site" comments are easy to dump! It's the ones that actually reference the post, but are intended as spam that are the difficult ones to identify. Akismet doesn't usually catch them, because it's a person, not a 'bot'. I'd be curious to hear about what the rest of your readers have to say! :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for continuing the conversation Andrew - the &#8220;nice site&#8221; comments are easy to dump! It&#8217;s the ones that actually reference the post, but are intended as spam that are the difficult ones to identify. Akismet doesn&#8217;t usually catch them, because it&#8217;s a person, not a &#8216;bot&#8217;. I&#8217;d be curious to hear about what the rest of your readers have to say! <img src='http://facibus.com/onblogging/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
